A City in Search of Good Fortune

Buenaventura, Colombia, is battling paramilitary gangs, drug traffickers, and corruption.

Buenaventura, Colombia
Buenaventura, Colombia

Mention to anyone in Colombia’s capital, Bogota, that you are planning a trip to the port city of Buenaventura, on the Pacific Coast, and you will likely encounter stern warnings and looks of disbelief. Buenaventura holds a special, troubled place in the Colombian psyche. For decades the inability of the federal government to tame the hyper-violent city — despite efforts by the wildly popular and controversial president Alvaro Uribe — typifies the disruptive power of what has become a zone of insurgency — Colombia’s “wild frontier.” As recently as a few years ago, drug traffickers and right-wing militants fought daily turf wars in the city’s slums while guerrillas and paramilitaries battled for control of the sole access route to the city through the Andes. Although a massive military presence has dramatically improved security, even today skirmishes are not uncommon along the main road into the city, where the guerrillas now fight U.S.-trained Colombian government forces.

Ultimately the battle for Buenaventura is about control. The city of Buenaventura (population 325,000), home to one of Colombia’s largest and most profitable seaports, is also close to the country’s most productive coca fields. This strategic location accounts for the city’s shadow economy of illegal cocaine exports and imported black market dollars, which flow along with regulated products like coffee and sugar cane. External forces (the central government, shareholders of Buenaventura’s privately owned port authority, the U.S. State Department) seek to regulate the city in order to ensure an uninterrupted flow of legal goods. At the same time, a parallel set of local players (guerrillas, paramilitaries, drug lords) prefers instead to maintain a status quo of informal instability that enables the transshipment of illegal drugs to markets in Western Europe and the United States.

But even as Buenaventurans work to improve their collective condition, they are caught in this tangled web of competing interests that exploit the city for profit (legal and illegal) yet fail to invest in the its future. Part of the problem is that many in the country perceive Buenaventura as peripheral. Physically, the city is remote — an island located at the western edge of the Andes. Economically, it is marginal — the profitable port is actually controlled by a private consortium of organizations located throughout the country — and 80 percent of the population lives in poverty. Ethnically, the city is about 85 percent Afro-Colombian — more than four times the national average of a population that is disproportionately disadvantaged in Colombia. Buenaventura is often compared disparagingly to cities of the African diaspora — or more accurately, to stereotypical notions of African cities — by federal, state, and even city officials charged with leading Buenaventura’s economic and urban development. Its divergence from normative urban ideals has contributed to its reputation as a city uniquely unable to improve its condition.

View Slideshow

That is not to say that all of Buenaventura’s problems are external. Whenever the subject of corruption comes up, the locals are likely to tell one story in particular: the city’s mayor, José Felix Ocoró Minotta, one of the most prominent Afro-Colombian political leaders, was invited to Washington, for the inauguration of Barack Obama, but was denied a U.S. visa due to a criminal conviction on charges of corruption. Corruption, locals will tell you, is a way of life; it can make it hard not only to attend a U.S. presidential inauguration but also to guarantee basic municipal services. A case in point: Buenaventura is one of the rainiest cities on earth, yet the public water agency supplies water only for several hours in the morning and only to those homes (a minority) that are connected to the system.

The Colombian government has now given Buenaventura a special status to streamline actions, and avoid potential local corruption, as it struggles with complex and interconnected military, political, social and economic problems. One of the first projects undertaken through this effort is a new US$30 million development, initiated by the Colombian government and backed by USAID, that will relocate residents of Buenaventura’s coastal slum communities — comunas — to new inland developments. In Colombia the plan is being hailed as an innovation for coupling a “technical” team of architects and urban planners with a “social” team of social scientists. The goal is to provide transplanted communities with both new houses and new jobs — a bid to improve living standards, push drug-runners from the coast and make way for waterfront redevelopment. As with any instance of urban renewal, the move is emotionally loaded due to the residents’ hesitance to leave their homes by the sea — traditionally their source of economic activity.

Although living conditions in the comunas are undoubtedly bad, it is not clear that the proposed relocation will really improve the lives of the community. The new project is located miles from the city center, in an area with little access either to existing urban infrastructure or to the economic engine that is the sea. In fact, the development might actually worsen the situation for the local population. Due to its relative remoteness and socio-economic homogeneity, the new development might further segregate Buenaventura’s most vulnerable population. From a certain vantage, the population of comunas residents could be viewed as peripheral even to the project that purportedly seeks to improve their condition. The ultimate goal of the new development might be to “clean up” the coastal edges of Buenaventura’s urban island, replacing slums and narco-trafficking with waterfront hotels and tourism. Focusing in particular on the story of Comuna 3 and the government’s proposal to move it inland, we will now — in the slideshow that follows — look more closely at the urban, social, economic and political fabric of Buenaventura, through images, analyses and interviews.

Quilian Riano & DK Osseo-Asare, “A City in Search of Good Fortune,” Places Journal, November 2009. Accessed 10 Jun 2023. https://doi.org/10.22269/091119

Comments are closed. If you would like to share your thoughts about this article, or anything else on Places Journal, visit our Facebook page or send us a message on Twitter.

Past Discussions View
  • brian

    01.11.2010 at 15:10

    interesting reporting. I would imagine this is an exemplary case of a ubiquitous phenomenon in latin american cities. It seems to be primarily dealt with in two ways, which you touch on here; architects are brought in to make single, catalytic incisions operating within the existing fabric, or the city government raizes the existing fabric and builds new, generic homes establishing new parameters within which the displaced populace is enabled/encouraged to operate.

    Some of the best work I know of in this field is being done by IIED-al in Argentina.

  • Fernando

    01.13.2010 at 06:42

    Very interesting reporting indeed.

    The picture reminds me very much of Cuba and a photo series we shot there a couple of months ago.

  • Joel McKellar

    01.13.2010 at 12:59

    Great stuff... reminds me of a quote from our local police chief, which seems to be lost on those planning this exodus:

    "Crime doesn't follow poverty, it follows concentrations of poverty."

    It's generally better to disperse affordable housing into market rate developments than to create 'projects' similar to what was built in mid-century american cities. It's a much more difficult proposition, but I suspect the plan you report on is likely doomed to simply shift crime to another area rather than reduce it overall.

  • Gisselle Cifuentes

    01.14.2010 at 10:09

    Estoy convencida que esta es la más real descripción del bello puerto del mar de Buenaventura, conozco muy bien la ciudad y estoy de acuerdo en que aunque los esfuerzos son bien intencionados no por ello son ideales para mitigar la situación social, económica, laboral y de calidad de vida de la gente, especialmente en las comunas 3 y 4 de Buernaventura. Gran trabajo.

  • brian

    01.14.2010 at 11:16

    Pero es que hay otra forma de actuar sobre las viviendas y mejorar las situaciones sociales y economicas? Hay otro grupo/agencia de la ciudad/region que interviene de otra forma para sobresaltar las difucultades proveniendo de esos barrios. O es mejor que no hagan nada?

    Estoy de acuerdo de que tirar por abajo el "social capital" es peligroso y destructivo. pero mas facile...

  • Nick

    01.19.2010 at 08:34

    I believe that this plan is worth a shot. It seems that this city needs to take a risk in order to improve the overall life quality in the city. Whether it be for the better or the worse, citizens of Buenaventura are too proud of their city to have it be presented the way it is. Architectural developement is key in order to attract tourism which can possibly lead to lower crime rates.