Salmonscape

California’s Central Valley Chinook migrate through state and federal water projects. As they map the sprawling isoscape, tracking the atomic signature of this industrialized watershed, they also change it. They are landscape makers in every sense.

Mendota Dam on the San Joaquin River, Fresno County, California. [Cynthia Hooper]

A salmon’s lifecycle is often described as heroic — their youthful adventure to the sea followed by a fateful return to spawn, and then die, at their place of birth. But this epic journey is complicated for most salmon today, and especially for California’s Central Valley Chinook, who travel through the nation’s largest water delivery system. Often born in hatcheries or in the shallows below dams, juvenile salmon swim through altered rivers and canals and are trucked around reservoirs and pumping plants on their way to the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta and then San Francisco Bay. They grow to maturity in the Pacific Ocean and then, as adults, use their sight, smell, and geomagnetic cues to return home. As they navigate the valley’s maze of aquatic environments, their eye lenses and ear bones track the atomic signature of every waterway they’ve known. And as they map this sprawling isoscape, they also change it, bringing valley chemistry to the ocean and marine chemistry back to the valley. After spawning, their bodies release ocean nutrients that fertilize terrestrial environments far from the coast. They are landscape makers, in every sense.

Born in hatcheries or in the shallows below dams, juvenile salmon swim through altered rivers and canals and are trucked around reservoirs and pumping plants.

These fish are crucial to the lifeways of many Indigenous people. They support West Coast fisheries and Southern Resident Orcas. And they are intimately entangled in a panorama of industrial agriculture that supplies nuts, grains, fruits, and vegetables for global markets. This decidedly fish-unfriendly place nevertheless has landscape elements specifically designed for their needs — ladders and notches to get around dams and weirs; screened canal gates and truck rides to circumvent hazards; excavated side channels, reconstructed wetlands, and replenished gravel for spawning. The element that salmon need most — sufficient and cool enough in-river flows — is regulated by a complex regime of legislative mandates, administrative decisions, court rulings, and negotiated settlements. 1 State and federal agencies divvy up water for agriculture and cities and for endangered and threatened species, including two of the four runs of Central Valley Chinook. 2

Over the past several years, I have been following the migration of these extraordinary creatures, documenting the Central Valley salmonscape in videos and photos — as I did for engineered bird habitats in an earlier feature on Places. 3 This work has taken me to many out-of-the-way sites, known mainly to local fishers, water managers, and conservation scientists. From a vantage point above the water, these places are unexpectedly serene, and efforts to curtail this extinction crisis seem straightforward and sensible.

Under-construction Salmon Highway through the Fremont Weir, December 2022. [Cynthia Hooper]

Fish screen at the Tracy Fish Collection Facility, Central Valley Project Jones Pumping Plant. [Cynthia Hooper]

Durham Mutual Dam, with fish ladder, on Butte Creek. [Cynthia Hooper]

The four distinct runs of Central Valley Chinook have evolved unique life histories that exploit valley rivers at different elevations and staggered times of the year. They adapted to Pleistocene shifts in glaciation, sea level, and rainfall, and they can thrive in dynamic conditions so long as valley rivers remain cold and well-oxygenated. But, today, dams obstruct 95 percent of their historical spawning habitat. Diking, draining, and legacy mining have destroyed river complexity and disconnected the floodplains that nurture juvenile fish. Industrial agriculture degrades water quality and dewaters spawning grounds. In the Delta, juveniles are entrained by diversions, eaten by predators, and sickened by pesticides and urban pollution. In the open ocean, they face overfishing and diminished cold-water upwelling that makes it harder to find prey like crab larvae and sardines. And, of course, global warming brings intensified cycles of drought and deluge. Mountain snow evaporates and melts early, leading to warmer river flows later in the year. 4

Dams obstruct 95 percent of their historical spawning habitat.

Five major Chinook hatcheries release tens of millions of juveniles annually, but this earnest production isn’t helping wild salmon. Hatchery fish compete with wild kin for food, mates, and nest sites, and when a hatchery spawner chooses a wild partner, their domesticated genetics get passed on. 5 Wild salmon have a phenotypic plasticity that helps them adapt to habitat changes. They can colonize a new stream if one becomes blocked or delay migration if a stream gets too warm. A rich portfolio of life history options stabilizes populations by spreading environmental risk across habitats and over time. But behavioral variation is hobbled by hatchery culture, which in turn makes hatchery salmon less responsive to climate change. 6

The Stalwart Fall Run

Cynthia Hooper, Anadromous Architectures: Fall Run, 2024.

Fall-run Chinook enter the San Francisco estuary in autumn to rapidly spawn and then die in rivers and streams on the valley floor. Once a million spawners strong, this run inhabited all Central Valley watersheds from the Kings River northward. More recently, they have averaged about 200,000 spawners, and that number continues to decline. 7 Since this run evolved to leave lowland rivers before the water gets too warm, they are better adapted to the valley’s truncated hydrology and preferred for hatchery culture. These fish grow rapidly in a stable, semi-captive environment, where adults can be quickly spawned and juveniles quickly flushed back into the system. Today, all valley fall-run are of hatchery origin or have hatchery genetics. Yet without robust hatchery production, the state’s salmon fisheries might well be extinct.

The largest producer is the Coleman National Fish Hatchery, followed by the Nimbus, Feather River, Mokelumne, and Merced facilities. 8 Each has a river-spanning barrier weir leading to a fish ladder where human visitors can watch the muscular leaping of adult salmon as they return to the hatchery. Upon arrival, the fish wait in holding ponds to be sorted, euthanized, and then manually spawned. Fertilized eggs incubate in trays, and hatchlings grow in indoor plastic tubs before being moved outside to concrete raceways. Before their release, some juveniles get a fin clipped for identification and a tiny wire tracking tag injected into their nose. If conditions are right, they are then sprayed through a tube into the river near the hatchery; but if the river is too low, too slow, too warm, or too clear, they will be released much farther downstream, which could scramble the senses they rely on to return home. 9

The Intrepid Spring Run

Cynthia Hooper, Anadromous Architectures: Spring Run, 2024.

Once abundant spring-run Chinook are venerated by salmon-based tribes: they arrive early, are especially nutritious, and are essential to Indigenous culture and diet. Compared to the fall-run, they spend more of their lifecycle in freshwater. Juveniles linger in rivers and floodplains for up to a year before heading to sea, and returning adults spend the summer in deep pools before spawning in fall. They evolved to reach higher-elevation watersheds — habitats now blocked by hundreds of dams — flourishing in the San Joaquin River before the construction of the Friant Dam and in the cold northern tributaries of the Sacramento before Shasta Dam. Now almost entirely cut off from that altitudinous geography, only a few remnant populations remain.

As passages are upgraded, a new population of spring-run Chinook will be able to migrate on their own to spawning grounds below Friant Dam.

The San Joaquin River Restoration Program is now reestablishing a long-lost population of spring-run Chinook. 10 This effort includes reconnecting 152 miles of fragmented river. One reach of the lower San Joaquin is obstructed by dams and another is perennially dry. Yet another flows through a mid-century flood management canal, the Eastside Bypass, which is being modified to improve migration and create new floodplain. 11 As passages are upgraded around all the chokepoints, this new population will be able to migrate on their own to and from spawning grounds below Friant Dam. 12 Until then, the fish need to be trapped and trucked, at least in most years. But with heavy rainfall in 2019, hundreds of project spring-run surmounted all the San Joaquin’s obstacles — including Sack Dam, Mendota Dam, and the river’s flood control system — to reach their destination. 13

More migration heroics can be found farther north in Butte Creek, a modest but critical tributary of the Sacramento River that hosts a genetically unique population of spring-run Chinook — fully wild fish with no hatchery influence. 14 Butte Creek flows out of a wildfire-scarred canyon into a mosaic of Sacramento Valley rice fields and through the verdant Butte Sink before spilling into a vintage flood control system, the Sutter Bypass. This bypass provides a fish-nurturing floodplain, which is incredibly rare for a Central Valley watershed. 15 Many small dams on the creek have undergone retrofits, but the population of wild spring-run are still in grave danger. Recent years of low flows and warm water have killed cohorts of adults before they can spawn, and an aging hydroelectric project dumped smothering sediment into a critical spawning reach. 16 Canyon activists have secured a permanent water right for the fish, and they advocate retrofitting the hydroelectric project to better support salmon — including using the facility’s antique flume system to activate cold flows. 17

Volcano Fish: The Winter Run

Cynthia Hooper, Anadromous Architectures: Winter Run, 2024.

The winter-run Chinook evolved at the base of two Cascade volcanoes. Historically, adults migrated up the Sacramento River in winter and then lingered through the summer to spawn in frigid tributaries below majestic Mounts Shasta and Lassen. Snowmelt percolating through springs in porous lava formations kept salmon nests dependably chilly, no matter the season. When the Shasta Dam was completed in 1945, these fish were not expected to survive, yet a wild-spawning population persists, nine miles downstream, in a stretch of the Sacramento River below Keswick Dam. They can spawn here because the dam has assumed the thermal management work once performed by the volcanoes. An enormous Temperature Control Device with gates of varied depths siphons cold water from deep in the reservoir for release during critical egg incubation times. 18 These flows are managed by a throng of operational commitments — including contract deliveries, environmental laws, and Delta outflow requirements — but during drought years, valley agriculture can get deliveries before flows for the fish. 19 The result is mass mortality of nearly all salmon eggs and fry, which means a river with fewer spawners three years later, leading to even fewer juveniles, then fewer adult salmon three years on, in a spiral towards extinction. 20

With only one population remaining, redundancy is critical for the imperiled winter-run. A conservation hatchery keeps a cradle-to-grave population as a hedge against catastrophe and propagates juveniles for reintroduction elsewhere in the watershed. 21 Below Lassen Peak, antique hydroelectric operations on Battle Creek are being dismantled so fish can access higher-elevation habitat, and winter-run adults have successfully moved in. 22 Repopulating another river (the McCloud) is more challenging, because Shasta Dam and its huge reservoir stand in the way. A new pilot program is working out the logistics with an experimental Juvenile Salmonid Collection System; a delicate net spans the McCloud as it enters the reservoir, herding juveniles into a trap so they can be trucked downstream of the dams. 23 Returning adults will take an elevator up and over Keswick Dam to be driven back home. This improbably circuitous journey is nevertheless crucial for thwarting extinction, as the McCloud’s complex spatial structure promotes natural spawning and genetic diversity, and its drought-resistant thermal regime affords a climate refuge. This river and its salmon are in the care of the Winnemem-Wintu Tribe, whose ancestral home was also destroyed by the Shasta Dam. 24

Shasta Dam and Reservoir, Shasta County, California, June 2024. [Cynthia Hooper]

The Risky Delta

Nearing the ocean, all runs of Central Valley Chinook must pass through the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta at least twice in their lives. This vast estuary was once a nurturing place where juveniles could linger and grow, drifting amid a tidal buffet of tasty invertebrates and sheltered from predators amid lush thickets of plant life. Now hardened and simplified, the Delta is best avoided. Juveniles born in the Sacramento River system are lucky if they can stay in the mainstem and get flushed straight through. This route is made safer by giant gates on the Delta Cross Channel, a huge canal that diverts the Sacramento’s water toward the Delta’s inhospitable interior, which is awash with reverse flows, migration delays, altered food webs, and lethally warm and contaminated water. These gates are closed during periods of peak migration for endangered and threatened juveniles, and just downstream, a new bioacoustic fish fence — with deterrent sounds, strobe lights, and a bubble curtain — is meant to keep them out of the similarly perilous Georgianna Slough. 25

A bioacoustic fish fence — with deterrent sounds, strobe lights, and a bubble curtain — keeps fish out of the Georgianna Slough.

For San Joaquin River system juveniles, survival is likelier if they avoid their river’s main stem, since they’ll face armored shorelines, bountiful predators, and the polluted Port of Stockton. It’s better to be swept into the south Delta’s Old River channel toward the Central Valley Project’s gigantic Jones Pumping Plant and its fish collection facility, where they might get scooped up for a potentially lifesaving truck ride to the Delta’s western edge. (This represents an increase in through-Delta survival from less than two percent to about four percent.) Very unlucky are the juveniles that get pulled into the Franks Tract or the Clifton Court Forebay — the intake point for the State Water Project’s Banks Pumping Plant. These sprawling sites are crawling with hungry bass and other predators, so small salmonids have almost no chance of survival. 26

Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, with the lower Yolo Bypass at the top, Frank’s Tract in the center, and the Clifton Court Forebay at the bottom. [USDA National Aerial Imagery Program]

Floodplains Reimagined

The historical floodplains of the Central Valley once teemed with phytoplankton that made meals for tiny invertebrates, which in turn fed hundreds of millions of juvenile fish. These sunlit shallows were drained long ago to build agriculture and cities and the flood control systems that protect them. Many salmon migrating inside this infrastructure must face the Yolo Bypass, a massive earthwork of levees and weirs that diverts floodwater around metropolitan Sacramento. The Yolo Bypass can strand and kill fish, but it can also become a fish-nurturing floodplain. The newly completed Yolo Bypass Salmonid Habitat Restoration and Fish Passage Project includes a hundred-foot-wide notch in a century-old weir that has long been an obstacle to migration. The gated notch allows adults to pass upstream while controlling the frequency and duration of bypass flooding for the benefit of juveniles, so they can safely grow before heading to sea. 27

Nearly all the Sacramento Valley’s original floodplains have been transformed into rice fields, which (like salmon) need flooding to thrive. Pilot projects grow salmon and rice on the same landscape, rearing juveniles directly on flooded rice fields as well as (more easily) growing microscopic fish food that can be released directly into rivers. With the collaboration of rice farmers and water agencies like Reclamation District 108, this initiative could transform up to a half million acres of post-harvest rice fields into seasonal floodplains and restore significant parts of the Sacramento Valley’s ecological function. 28

Yolo Bypass Salmonid Habitat Restoration & Fish Passage Project (the Big Notch), January 2024. [Cynthia Hooper]

Master Planning the Salmonscape

All this restoration occurs within industrialized watersheds, since the extensive water projects that support California’s economy won’t be dismantled anytime soon — certainly not in time to save Central Valley salmonids. 29 In fact, the state’s water infrastructure is expected to expand. The Delta Conveyance Project will include a huge tunnel siphoning Sacramento River flows to a new south Delta pumping plant, and the Sites Reservoir will provide off-channel storage for the Sacramento’s high flows. 30 Both are designed to capture the extreme rainfall from atmospheric rivers for deployment during cycles of drought, and they are promoted as sensible upgrades for a climate-stressed system. Boosters for these projects bet that high-tech mitigation measures — like adaptive management and state-of-the-art fish screens — will increase the odds that native fish can persist with even fewer flows overall than they currently have. But these projects could lock in the same problems that bedevil existing systems, as shifting operational mandates and escalating global temperatures overcome the planned benefits to fish. 31

Water is critical habitat for fish, and restoration efforts can’t work without suitable flows. Plenty of accessible, 32 scientific, 33 innovative, 34 reconcilable, 35 and legal 36 research conclusively demonstrates how the state’s salmon can share their habitat with tens of millions of people. California’s water rights system needs better oversight, 37 more transparency, 38 and fundamentally more equity 39 — recognizing that managing demand is as critical as managing supply. 40 That the state’s agriculture interests consistently outmaneuver the fishing industry goes beyond settler water rights or political leverage — it’s also about the ongoing injustice of California’s colonization. 41 To White settlers, bountiful agriculture signaled prosperity and progress, while salmon were seen as a wild and pre-civilizational food source. Understanding and naming these lingering tropes can diffuse the power they still hold. 42 Acknowledging the astonishing social infrastructure that propels Indigenous activism can get this invaluable resource back on the menu and affirm once again California as a salmon state. 43

Slideshow
Author’s Note

This project is dedicated to all the tribes, scientists, activists, policymakers, and commercial and sport fishers who devote their lives to saving California salmon.

Additional Go-Pro video clips provided by NOAA Fisheries and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife.

Notes
  1. These laws include California Fish & Game Code § 5937, which requires sufficient water for fish be kept in good condition below dams, and the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act, which enables local water boards to regulate the quality and beneficial use of the state’s water. The State Water Resources Control Board’s Decision 1641 implements water quality objectives that protect Delta fish and wildlife, and its Order 90-5 establishes water quality objectives (including temperature management) for Sacramento River fisheries. The federal Central Valley Project Improvement Act requires that fish and wildlife get equal consideration with other demands for CVP water allocation.
  2. The two listed runs are the Sacramento winter-run Chinook (Endangered) and the Central Valley spring-run Chinook (Threatened). See NOAA Fisheries, “Chinook Salmon (Protected).”
  3. Cynthia Hooper, “The Land Where Birds Are Grown,” Places Journal, January 2019, https://doi.org/10.22269/190129.
  4. See Peter B. Moyle, Robert A. Lusardi, Patrick J. Samuel, and Jacob V.E. Katz, The State of the Salmonids: Status of California’s Emblematic Fishes, (UC Davis Center for Watershed Sciences and California Trout, 2017). This comprehensive report is written for a non-specialist audience and addresses the plight of all salmonids in the state, including Coho and Steelhead.
  5. For example, a prolonged influx of Feather River Hatchery strays to other Central Valley salmon populations can increase extinction risk of those populations after only four generations. See Moyle, et al., 90.
  6. F. Cordoleani, C. C. Phillis, A. M. Sturrock, A. M. FitzGerald, A. Malkassian, G. E. Whitman, P. K. Weber, and R. C. Johnson, “Threatened Salmon Rely on a Rare Life History Strategy in a Warming Landscape,” Nature Climate Change 11 (2021), 982–88, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01186-4.
  7. Fall-run Central Valley Chinook are the backbone of the state’s commercial fishing industry. From 1992 to 2006, an average of nearly 400,000 adult fall-run returned to spawn in the Sacramento-San Joaquin system, with an annual average of 484,000 harvested by commercial and sport fishers. In 2007, escapement plummeted to fewer than 100,000 fish, with about 121,000 harvested in fisheries, prompting the first-ever closure of the California ocean salmon fishery. Since the disastrous years of 2007 to 2009, Central Valley fall-run escapement has averaged under 200,000 annual returnees, with just under 80,000 returnees in 2022, prompting the complete closure of the state’s salmon fishery in 2023 and 2024. See Moyle, et al., 50, and California Department of Fish and Wildlife, California Central Valley Chinook Escapement Database Report, June 26, 2023.
  8. The Coleman hatchery also produces late fall-run Chinook, a genetically distinct race that once spawned in the habitat upstream of Shasta Reservoir, but is now reduced to that one hatchery-dependent population. The National Marine Fisheries Service currently considers the late fall-run to be in the same evolutionarily significant unit as the fall-run, and because they have similar geographical range and conservation concerns as the winter-run, the late fall-run does not have a separate section in this project.
  9. In drought years, Central Valley hatcheries truck millions of juveniles to points near San Francisco Bay (including Grizzly Bay and San Pablo Bay) for release. Maturing so far from a natal stream or facility scrambles a salmon’s olfactory and (possibly) internal geomagnetic compass for homing in on their birthplace, significantly increasing an adult’s likelihood of straying and unhelpfully spawning with wild kin, which in turn unhelpfully compromises the genetics of their offspring. Yet hatchery managers can lose virtually all their yearly juvenile production if these vulnerable fish are allowed to migrate unaided through a severely degraded river.
  10. Spring-run were once dominant in the San Joaquin River, with an estimated 500,000 spawners, but this run was extirpated from the river soon after Friant Dam’s completion in 1948. The new population of San Joaquin spring-run are transplants from the Feather River Fish Hatchery in the Sacramento Valley. See the San Joaquin River Restoration Program website for more information about this multi-agency effort.
  11. For a helpful visualization, see Geoff McGhee, “Tour the San Joaquin River: An Interactive Map and Tour of the San Joaquin,” Sierra, June 16, 2021.
  12. The Mendota Pool Fish Screen and Control Structure for Mendota Dam is integral to the SJRRP’s success and will need more nearby land acquisition and seepage easements before construction can begin. Completion is scheduled for 2028. The Arroyo Canal Fish Screen and Sack Dam Fish Passage Project for Sack Dam has been redesigned to accommodate nearby land subsidence, and construction is scheduled for 2025. The SJRRP estimates that the minimum flow to sustain a healthy population of fish for both water and temperature habitat is 2,500 cubic-feet-per-second throughout the entire system. Restoration flows vary by water year, month, and operational constraints, with flood years (like 2017, 2019, and 2023) creating up to twice the minimum flow, while in dry years (like 2020 and 2022) flows may diminish to nearly none, at certain times of year. The timing and volume of these restoration base flows and pulse flows is critically important: adequate spring flows are essential for adults to return and juveniles to migrate out of the system, and adequate fall flows in the spawning reach below Friant Dam are critical to maintain sufficiently cold water for safe egg and fry development. Management for climate change will necessitate increased river flows, sufficient cold-water storage in Millerton Reservoir above Friant Dam, and more planting of riparian cover to cool the San Joaquin riverbed. See the program website, cited in note 11.
  13. In 2019, researchers captured 23 naturally returning adult spring-run and counted 209 spring-run redds (salmon nests) in the spawning reach below Friant Dam. They estimated that more than 400 spawners made the journey from the ocean entirely on their own, for the first time in more than 65 years. See San Joaquin River Restoration Program, “Return of the Chinook,” YouTube.
  14. Only three Central Valley spring-run Chinook populations currently have no hatchery influence. The other two independent populations spawn in the Sacramento Valley’s Deer Creek and Mill Creek. Historically, there were eighteen independent populations of Central Valley spring-run.
  15. With every critical link in the salmon habitat chain still intact, Butte Creek’s watershed is essentially the last functioning floodplain system in the Central Valley. See Moyle, et al., 61. To learn more about restoration projects on Butte Creek over the past 30 years, see the short documentary by Kit Tyler, “Sharing Butte Creek,” which aired as an episode of PBS Viewfinder, November 17, 2021.
  16. The California State Water Resources Control Board website has information on the DeSabla-Centerville Hydroelectric Project.
  17. For more on the activists, see Friends of Butte Creek. The creek’s spring-run are vulnerable to extinction in as soon as two decades if there are only incremental management changes to the DeSabla-Centerville project. Only aggressive, refined, and flexible water and hydropower operations are likely to result in cooler water temperatures, more adults surviving to spawn, and extended population survival time for this critical population. See Lisa C. Thomson, et al., “Water Management Adaptations to Prevent Loss of Spring-Run a Chinook Salmon in California under Climate Change,” Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 138:5, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000194.
  18. In-river flows must be maintained at 53.6 degrees Fahrenheit or below to eliminate temperature-dependent mortality of winter-run eggs and fry, because their eggs cannot absorb oxygen in higher water temperatures. Water temperatures above 62 degrees are lethal for all Chinook eggs and fry.
  19. During the drought year of 2021, the federal Bureau of Reclamation and the State Water Resources Control Board released Shasta Reservoir’s scarce cold water for agricultural contractors too early in the season, resulting in the loss of temperature control on the Sacramento River and the temperature dependent mortality of 75 percent of winter-run eggs below Keswick Dam. Background mortality and a thiamine deficiency killed off almost all the remaining 2021 eggs and fry, resulting in a 97 percent mortality rate for that year. Similarly, during the drought years of 2014 and 2015, winter-run egg TDM was 77 percent and 86 percent respectively, resulting in an approximate 95 percent mortality rate for juvenile winter-run Chinook salmon. See NOAA Fisheries, “River Temperatures and Survival of Endangered California Winter-Run Chinook Salmon in the 2021 Drought.”
  20. After the disaster of 2021 (see note 19), during the drought year of 2022, reductions in agricultural deliveries permitted temperature management and a much-improved survival rate of more than 80 percent for winter-run eggs. Fewer returning spawners and a worsening thiamine deficiency, however, made that year the lowest on record for the production and survival of juvenile winter-run. Because most winter-run return to spawn at three years of age, three consecutive years of extreme drought or other catastrophes can spell extinction for this evolutionarily significant unit. See NOAA Fisheries, “Survival of Endangered California Winter-Run Chinook Salmon in 2022.”
  21. Four populations of winter-run existed historically in the Upper Sacramento, Pit River, McCloud River, and Battle Creek. At least three self-sustaining populations are needed to prevent winter-run extinction. Located at the base of Shasta Dam, the Livingston Stone National Fish Hatchery preferentially selects natural spawners for reproduction to maintain the winter-run’s genetic diversity, and in the near term this facility has rescued this run from extinction. Long-term over-reliance on hatchery production, however, can increase the extinction risk for the winter-run’s only wild-spawning population. See NOAA Fisheries, “2024 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation of Sacramento River Winter-Run Chinook Salmon,” 17-19.
  22. In 2018, Livingston Stone hatchery-raised winter-run juveniles were released into North Fork Battle Creek to “Jumpstart” a new population. Two years later, more than 1,000 adults and sub-adults volitionally returned, and winter-run were observed naturally reproducing in Battle Creek for the first time in more than one hundred years. See NOAA Fisheries, “2024 5-Year Review,” 62-63. For more information about the Battle Creek Salmon and Steelhead Restoration Project, see the California State Water Resources Control Board and California Trout, “Battle Creek Dams.”
  23. California Department of Water Resources, “Innovative Collection System Supports Reintroducing Winter-Run Salmon to the McCloud River,” February 1, 2024.
  24. See websites for the Winnemem Wintu Tribe and the Run4Salmon organization; as well as NOAA Fisheries, “The Original Salmon Stewards.”
  25. To read more about Delta migration routes and survival rates of Sacramento system juveniles see Russell W. Perry, John R. Skalski, Patricia L. Brandes, Philip T. Sandstrom, A. Peter Klimley, Arnold Ammann, and Bruce MacFarlane, “Estimating Survival and Migration Route Probabilities of Juvenile Chinook Salmon in the Sacramento–San Joaquin River Delta,” North American Journal of Fisheries Management 30:1 (2010), 142-56, https://doi.org/10.1577/M08-200.1.
  26. Through-Delta survival rates for juvenile salmonids depend on migration route, spatial distribution of predators, water conditions, water year, time of year, upstream releases, regulatory mechanisms, and state and federal pumping operations. A study from 2010 determined that through-Delta survival for San Joaquin River system juveniles was under 2 percent if they remained in the main stem and about 4 percent if they were lucky enough to get a CVP truck ride out of the Delta. See Rebecca A. Buchanan, Patricia L. Brandes, and John R. Skalski, “Survival of Juvenile Fall-Run Chinook Salmon through the San Joaquin River Delta, California, 2010–2015,” North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 38:3 (2018), 663-79, https://doi.org/10.1002/nafm.10063.
  27. See Kate Richter, “Upgrading Water Infrastructure to Improve Fish Passage and Habitat in the Yolo Bypass,” CART (2003); and R. Sommer, M.L. Nobriga, W.C. Harrell, W. Batham, and W.J. Kimmerer, “Floodplain Rearing of Juvenile Chinook Salmon: Evidence of Enhanced Growth and Survival,” Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 58:2 (2001), 333, https://doi.org/10.1139/f00-245.
  28. Propagating this food involves letting shallow water linger longer in a field so that more zooplankton can grow — up to 15,000 times more than in nearby rivers and canals. This nutritious soup is then pumped, using existing canal infrastructure, into the Sacramento River, where hungry juveniles can grow four to eight times faster than they would without the subsidy. In 2023, the cost for rice farmer participation in the “Fish Food” program was about $40 per acre/cycle, and there are currently more willing rice farmers than there is available funding for this rapidly scalable, cost-effective, and beneficial conservation program. For detailed information about this initiative, see State Water Contractors, “The Evolving Science of Floodplains for Restoring Multi-Benefit Landscapes,” from a symposium co-hosted with the Northern California Water Association, December 5, 2023, on YouTube, Part 1 and Part 2. See also, resources on the website of Reclamation District 108.
  29. If present trends continue, 74 percent of salmonids in California are headed for extinction by the end of the century, if not sooner. See Moyle, et al., The State of the Salmonids, 18.
  30. See California Department of Water Resources, The Delta Conveyance Project; and org.
  31. For more on the difficulty of “solving” landscape systems, see Rob Holmes, “The Problem with Solutions,” Places Journal, July 2020, https://doi.org/10.22269/200714; and Lizzie Yarina, “Your Sea Wall Won’t Save You,” Places Journal, March 2018, https://doi.org/10.22269/180327.
  32. California Trout, “States of the Salmonids II: Fish in Hot Water.”
  33. NOAA Fisheries, “Recovery Plan for The Evolutionarily Significant Units of Sacramento River Winter-run Chinook Salmon and Central Valley Spring-run Chinook Salmon and the DPS of California Central Valley Steelhead,” July 1, 2014.
  34. Peter B. Moyle, Karrigan Börk, Christine A. Parisek, Fabian A. Bombardelli, Jay Lund, and Andrew L. Rypel, “California Water Ideas that Deserve More Attention,” California WaterBlog, December 10, 2023.
  35. Ted Sommer, Jeffrey Mount, Brian Gray, Letitia Grenier, Jennifer Harder, and Gokce Sencan, “Climate-Smart Tools to Protect California’s Freshwater Biodiversity,” Public Policy Institute of California, May 2024.
  36. Felicia Marcus, Neil Green Nylen, Dave Owen, and Michael Kiparsky, “Five Guiding Principles for Effective Voluntary Agreements: A Case Study on VAs for Water and Habitat in California’s Bay-Delta Watershed,” January 2024.
  37. Ian James, “‘Improvised, Spotty, and Belated’: Will California Reform Its Oversight of Water Rights?,” Los Angeles Times, June 5, 2023.
  38. Michael Kiparsky, Kathleen Miller, Richard Roos-Collins, Emma Roos-Collins, and Dan Rademacher, “Piloting a Water Rights Information System for California,” July 2021.
  39. Ian James, “‘A Foundation of Racism’: California’s Antiquated Water Rights System Faces New Scrutiny,” Los Angeles Times, March 6, 2023.
  40. Rachel Becker, “California Farmers Could Save a Lot of Water — but Their Profits Would Suffer,” CalMatters, March 26, 2024.
  41. State Water Resources Control Board Resolution No. 2021-0050 (2021) acknowledges the systemic racism in California’s water rights system, though much needs to be done to rectify the loss of intergenerational wealth disadvantaged communities have long suffered because of the historical denial of water rights and property.
  42. Heather Anne Swanson, Marianne Elizabeth Lien, and Grow B. Ween, Domestication Gone Wild: Politics and Practices of Multispecies Relations (Duke University Press, 2018), 1-10.
  43. The Yurok Tribe, “Yurok Tribe Leads Massive Revegetation Project,” March 29, 2024.
Cite
Cynthia Hooper, “Salmonscape,” Places Journal, January 2025. Accessed 03 Jun 2026. https://doi.org/10.22269/250130

If you would like to comment on this article, or anything else on Places Journal, visit our Facebook page or send us a message on Twitter.